Parallel Worlds Probably Exist. Here’s Why

The most elegant interpretation of quantum mechanics is the universe is constantly splitting
A portion of this video was sponsored by Norton. Get up to 60% off the first year (annually billed) here: or use promo code VERITASIUM
Special thanks to:
Prof. Sean Carroll
His book, a major source for this video is 'Something Deeply Hidden: Quantum Worlds and The Emergence of Spacetime'
Code for solving the Schrödinger equation by Jonny Hyman available here:
I learned quantum mechanics the traditional 'Copenhagen Interpretation' way. We can use the Schrödinger equation to solve for and evolve wave functions. Then we invoke wave-particle duality, in essence things we detect as particles can behave as waves when they aren't interacting with anything. But when there is a measurement, the wave function collapses leaving us with a definite particle detection. If we repeat the experiment many times, we find the statistics of these results mirror the amplitude of the wave function squared. Hence the Born rule came into being, saying the wave function should be interpreted statistically, that our universe at the most fundamental scale is probabilistic rather than deterministic. This did not sit well with scientists like Einstein and Schrödinger who believed there must be more going on, perhaps 'hidden variables'.
In the 1950's Hugh Everett proposed the Many Worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. It is so logical in hindsight but with a bias towards the classical world, experiments and measurements to guide their thinking, it's understandable why the founders of quantum theory didn't come up with it. Rather than proposing different dynamics for measurement, Everett suggests that measurement is something that happens naturally in the course of quantum particles interacting with each other. The conclusion is inescapable. There is nothing special about measurement, it is just the observer becoming entangled with a wave function in a superposition. Since one observer can experience only their own branch, it appears as if the other possibilities have disappeared but in reality there is no reason why they could not still exist and just fail to interact with the other branches. This is caused by environmental decoherence.
Schrodinger's cat animation by Iván Tello
Wave functions, double slit and entanglement animation by Jonny Hyman
Filming of opening sequence by Casey Rentz
Special thanks to Mithuna Y, Raquel Nuno and Dianna Cowern for feedback on the script
Music from "Experimental 1" "Serene Story 2" "Seaweed" "Colorful Animation 4"


  • P e t e r
    P e t e r4 orë më parë

    put a chicken egg in a sealed box and it can be thought of being hatched and not hatched until we check? Erm, no. Drawing board time.

  • Bom Demais Uai - Zac Arceneaux
    Bom Demais Uai - Zac Arceneaux5 orë më parë

    Soooo, is there a primary world that initiates the sequence of events of the others?

  • Mr Messiah
    Mr Messiah10 orë më parë

    Maybe I’ll find all my lost socks in this parallel world

  • B2 - Almario, Sean Anthony, Santos
    B2 - Almario, Sean Anthony, Santos10 orë më parë

    If a single atom changes state, a new reality is born.

  • Sharon Jarvis-Young
    Sharon Jarvis-Young10 orë më parë

    Thanks for making science 'hot' and fun again...

  • boryswwa
    boryswwa10 orë më parë

    Just wondering... What if: atom does not decay randomly, but we just assumed so, as we were unable to determine the exact function that describes atom's decay? If that's the case, wouldn't it brake the whole quantum theory?

  • Tanveer Seetohul
    Tanveer Seetohul12 orë më parë

    Aren't we the chosen one,if countless of us exist

  • Danzel Baker
    Danzel Baker13 orë më parë

    Does anyone else hear Halo: Reach music hidden in the background or is that just me? Like in the first 2 min

  • Iciyas Yas
    Iciyas Yas17 orë më parë

    is Quantum philosophy or physics ??!! to my understanding when I was young, I made a decision to follow the path that took me to where I am now. Does that mean the other versions of me who had made multiples different decisions are living other lives totally different from mine. But then how many versions of me were and where were they when I initially was confronted to that decision? or were we split apart once I do made my decision? The problem is that, during my whole life I made and am still making decisions that to some extent change the course of my life (some positively, some not). The question is how many versions of me were created because of this action? how many worlds exist for each decision ?!!. Think of the simultaneous actions of this kind that happen all around the world from human beings, and animals as well. !!!!??

  • Bien Elbertson Aguas
    Bien Elbertson Aguas18 orë më parë

    So i can say that who ever reads this is not the original branch

  • Leonardo Curia
    Leonardo Curia20 orë më parë

    What if there was different reality before all physic "rules" where there? It would mean that acrually they are infinit ways the unives is working. Therefore everything you can and can not think about might exist.

  • misterlyle
    misterlyleDitë më parë

    I don't know what it is, but there is something profoundly flawed about this notion.

  • Paul met Debbie
    Paul met DebbieDitë më parë

    Superposition is wrongly understood. There is neither a single electron nor a wave. There are only the appearances of such. Reality (which can't be observed) is a substratum that is neither wave nor particle - and both and beyond. There are no isolated unentangled quantum particles. Everything is entangled. Not as a thing or several things. There is only the whole of the universe and beyond. There are isolated appearances, much like a fata morgana. Both the observer and the observed are like that. But one illusion's obeservation of another illusion is just that: yet another illusion. Particles do not interact only when they collide. They "interact" constantly because they are not separate but features of the whole. They appear to be interacting but these are only the shadows of the play of the whole, observed by the same. The multiverse is indeed what is happening. Only it is not in time, it is a timeless whole. All possibilities happen neverywhere and everywhen. When they happen they appear as separate events and things in time, but in reality they are still one undevided whole. 15:35 all these world have the same amplitude. It has no dimension. The world he is talking in and we are listening at, has the same possibility and amplitude as the world in which he is president. In that world he will say that there is a very low amplitude world in which he is a professor. 18:30 Breaking the wave function into different pieces is not only a human convenience, it is the mistake the mind makes when it creates the illusion of separation and apparently destroys the reallityof wholeness. In reality this does not and cannot happen. There is the whole wave function timelesssly happening. And we are it, observing and observed simultaneously. There is no way out and no way in. There is no way to understand this by the finite mind nor can we surrender to it. Because we simply are already it. The mind can play with it. But it will just be that: illusory childsplay. Fun, but irrelevant in the way that it will never take us into experiencing what really is. The mind cannot go there. Only Awareness can. Where the mind is not, reality is. Ubi non cogito, ibi sum.

  • Alex Samajaya
    Alex SamajayaDitë më parë

    Lord Buddha already explained this 2600 years ago but only now scientist start to guess it 🤣🤣

  • Melanie A
    Melanie ADitë më parë

    I know you tried, but I still don't understand quantum mechanics

  • Silent Fox 1
    Silent Fox 1Ditë më parë

    this is just clickbait, where is the part about parallel universes and you have to explain something in normal english

  • diamondbreak
    diamondbreakDitë më parë

    The main point of a video like this is to make ordinary people understand by explicitly simplification, not just a bunch of your kinda people ever do.

  • Martin Halvax
    Martin HalvaxDitë më parë

    I will be honest. I'm 33 years old and after watching videos about this subject many times before, this video actually helped me finally understand it. It was the explanation in perfect sync with the visual aid that did the job.

  • Story Mode
    Story ModeDitë më parë

    ... I always wondered if our perspective was the 4th dimension..

  • Júlia Ma F. Melo
    Júlia Ma F. MeloDitë më parë

    dianna sent me and i love the like at 9:19

  • BFG Gaming Australia
    BFG Gaming AustraliaDitë më parë

    Entanglement is my favourite topic. At the end there you went a bit quiet? Did your brain reset?

  • jin choung
    jin choungDitë më parë

    you should clarify - not EVERYTHING will happen. BUT everything that **CAN** HAPPEN... WILL HAPPEN.

  • Rafi Ewaldo
    Rafi EwaldoDitë më parë

    big ups for knowing the Schrödinger theory from bunny girl senpai

  • yellow lemon
    yellow lemonDitë më parë

    So am i the original me or the multiverse me.

  • Julius Tomt
    Julius TomtDitë më parë

    So somewhere in universe my thaimother in law does watering everything around the house in thailand when we not there! Just make me moore angry!

  • fearless avocado
    fearless avocadoDitë më parë

    It feels like the more you know, the more you realize how less you know

  • Keith Walker
    Keith WalkerDitë më parë

    Okay so if even an atom in your body entering a superposition state causes a split, doesn't that mean it's been occurring since you were a child? or a fetus? I mean, you've been comprised of atoms decaying you're entire life and will continue to until you die. Also don't you have to take into account things that could influence the outcome of the events? Yeah maybe there is an infinite number of different versions of you, but will you be an NBA star in one of your worlds? You have genetics and predetermined factors in your biology that would sway you in certain ways. UNLESS we argue there is an infinite number of versions of both your mother and father and their parents which will alter the genes passed on to you which in turn would change the outcome of your birth which would then ALSO affect the way that you split entirely in the first place, but could you argue that the birth in that instance is even you? Now even your genes and DNA have been altered. Now the birth would be a completely separate person. Is this maybe how we could explain consciousness and why my consciousness is separate from someone elses?

  • Khafi
    KhafiDitë më parë

    So in the parallel world they made a video there's no chance of parallel universe? Lol

  • Abusimbel
    AbusimbelDitë më parë

    Ready for quantum suicide ?

  • Mr KillSteal
    Mr KillStealDitë më parë

    Learned more than 5 days of school in this vid.

  • Rushi Ladani
    Rushi LadaniDitë më parë

    Thank you for making this video. More quantum physics pleease.

  • Greg Russell
    Greg RussellDitë më parë

    The simple fact that measurement (or observation in the case of humans) is a constant and can NOT be removed means you were just "supposing" for 20 mins.

  • Jeff Oh
    Jeff Oh2 ditë më parë

    Wow, somewhere in a parallel universe, I am literally crapping my pants over this video right now....

  • Vladimir Georgiev
    Vladimir Georgiev2 ditë më parë

    Do all this have something in common with dejavu ?

  • Tanvir ahamed
    Tanvir ahamed2 ditë më parë

    using imaginary no sense numbers ? my whole life was a lie there is no meaning of science anymore

  • Teena Jain
    Teena Jain2 ditë më parë

    Now my high school maths becomes very easy to me after watching this video👍

  • Anthony Quigley
    Anthony Quigley2 ditë më parë

    ofc they dont exist ffs, this channel annoys me

  • GetawayFilms
    GetawayFilms2 ditë më parë

    When you hear Sean Carroll's voice.. You know shit's about to get (sur)real

  • Marcos Amaral
    Marcos Amaral2 ditë më parë

    I do have some problem with this, specially, because I wish to know how to measure the particle. How is it done? If the particle is a wave and you take a sample in a instant, of course is a point, and of course there is a probability to the amplitude according to the wave. Take telecommunication for instance, each channel of a wireless system is giving a symbol and a frequency, but if you take the time and let it happen, the whole wave gets there and the band is formed in the spectrum, according to the probability of the communication. Note that this does not mean the wave is probabilistic, its just that we can't see it other way. My other doubt is about the fact that the 2 particles that are together have one wave function. Does we have the technology to measure 2 elétrons so close that is less than the size of a proton? How they measure that in order to say, for sure, that the wave function became one? If It is one theoretical, how can everyone be so sure? I do understand though, that for now our predictions are being a success, and the modern science do make sense. My only concern is: in the field of calibration, practical day to day accreditation of laboratories, there is a rule that the entity that makes the measurements cannot calibrate it self. It must be someone else. Well, our mathematics and equations are pretty solid, but how can we be so sure about then? ( Not saying It is all wrong) But during hundreds of years, imaginary numbers were considered wrong. Isn't the time to evaluate that to? Please, not against science, rather the opposite. It is like your vídeo about lightspeed. Great questioning there though.

  • comichound
    comichound2 ditë më parë

    Schrödinger was attempting to demonstrate the illogic of the superposition. In reality, no superposition truly exists. The isotope either has or hasn’t decayed, we merely cannot tell from the information we have. This is literally no different than flipping a coin and then claiming, “as long as my hand is over the coin, the coin is in a super position of both heads and tails. Only by moving my hand and observing the coin, does it collapse into either heads or tails.” No. Reality is either A or Not A. A thing cannot be both A and Not A in the same way at the same time.

  • meesalikeu
    meesalikeu2 ditë më parë


  • Tal Moore
    Tal Moore2 ditë më parë

    Aristotle proved, way back in ca. 300 BCE, that the many worlds interpretation is pretty much nonsense. Read his deconstruction of continuous reality in the _Physics_ and _Metaphysics._

  • Moss
    Moss2 ditë më parë

    You blew my mind.

  • The Survivors of the Quickening
    The Survivors of the Quickening2 ditë më parë

    "I'll wake you up whenever you discover the right answer" 💭 👽

  • ginsengjin
    ginsengjin2 ditë më parë

    I don't get the part about conservation of energy. If it's splitting of energy and it's halved each time... that doesn't make sense as that won't go very far. Even if it wasn't exactly half, how can you split into smaller parts so many times. Where's all that "hidden" energy that we don't observe being taken out of "our" branch. Anyone have a ELI5 explanation for that one?

  • oscar g luja
    oscar g luja2 ditë më parë

    Aztec mythology: Ometeotl self-sacrificed into four major Tezcatlipocas and all dieties in order to initiate the Dialect Games here, there, now, & then. And here we are ever since, all busy into the "bla?, bla"/ "bla?, bla"/ forever. Case closed 🔐 😁🤔🤗/😁🤔🤗

  • mohammad husseini
    mohammad husseini2 ditë më parë

    Reason why we interpret quantum physics and its reality the way we do now is simply because we know a drop in an ocean and trying to make full sense of it, when the time comes (if it ever come) and we learn and understand enough only the we will be able to make sense and understand more clearly on what’s going on in this world we live in,

  • tr99ac
    tr99ac2 ditë më parë

    You can be anything - Barbie

  • Hugo Clarke
    Hugo Clarke2 ditë më parë

    Thank you, you are a legend

  • grizcuz
    grizcuz2 ditë më parë

    I've probably massively misunderstood something here. And I'm even going to struggle to formulate the question coherently. Is the wave function just an hypothesis, or something like a mathematical construct that allows us to build the rest of quantum mechanics around it? Or, is it a physical aspect of time and space and something that we can observe and measure? I don't understand how we can be certain about this aspect of QM, when measurement/observation then causes it to collapse? How do we know anything about its properties when observation and/or measurement then makes it unquantifiable?

    BLKBRDSR712 ditë më parë

    Rick & Morty is starting to make sense.

  • ximal popoca
    ximal popoca2 ditë më parë

    In other words we're all different versions of the same guy playing the "who are you?", 'nice to meet you", etc etc This way loneliness ceases to be and it all makes sense finally 😁+👽+👻=1

  • A H

    A H

    2 ditë më parë

    I thought I would have to scroll down a lot more before I found the blabbering senile clowns

  • Bat Fastard

    Bat Fastard

    2 ditë më parë

    Time as X and space as Y with different realities. This is simulation of human past, all the possible scenarios

  • Suman Baruah
    Suman Baruah2 ditë më parë

    Universe inside uiniverse

  • Dejawolfs
    Dejawolfs2 ditë më parë

    for some reason this video made me think of how when you strum a guitar string, all the other strings on the guitar also vibrate a bit, because they are all sort of entangled on the guitar.

  • Sopan Roy
    Sopan Roy2 ditë më parë


  • NotEvenHere
    NotEvenHere3 ditë më parë

    So in another universe there's an alternative me slipping Milla Jovovich a portion or two? I don't need math or fancy symbols to tell me that dog don't hunt.

  • Fihlippe Luhis
    Fihlippe Luhis3 ditë më parë

    14:36 *Among Us*

  • Mister phmpg
    Mister phmpg3 ditë më parë

    You have all heard about Schrödingers Cat. But do you know Cödingers Schrat? It is both lead and adive!

  • Gaurav Sharma
    Gaurav Sharma3 ditë më parë

    I am pretty sure, this is the guy who writes BIG BANG THEORY Jokes. Because, I am pretty sure, they can not. But, may be, they can, in another world? But, pretty sure, in this world, it is him who writes.

  • David Bell
    David Bell3 ditë më parë


  • Einfacher Kerl
    Einfacher Kerl3 ditë më parë

    I can't believe that such a garbage idea is worth a video. an idea that cannot be proved ever. no evidence, no hope of ever turning into a material one What the world is coming to? Multi-verse, planet 9, flat earth, evolution ... _"When man stopped believing in God, he started believing anything"_

  • Matthew Tilley
    Matthew Tilley3 ditë më parë

    Where are the cited studies for this?

  • Lady Malora
    Lady Malora3 ditë më parë

    The problem is that Schrodinger chose a live subject, the cat. If the problem comes about because no one can observe what's happening in the box until they open it, it's not a problem. The cat observes what's happening in the box. There has to be a better example than the cat in a box to explain what Schrodinger meant.

  • Tayro Thinkingoutloud
    Tayro Thinkingoutloud3 ditë më parë

    I've done the math. The answer is 6.480740698².

  • Ричи Яркий
    Ричи Яркий3 ditë më parë

    the many-worlds interpretation is absurd, since cannot explain why we only move to one universe, i.e. in fact, we feel ourselves only in a certain universe

  • Ken Jackson
    Ken Jackson3 ditë më parë

    The Many Worlds hypothesis is a totally unfalsifiable junk hypothesis.

  • Lumalee


    3 ditë më parë

    Then prove it

  • Tam Nguyen
    Tam Nguyen3 ditë më parë

    "the cat is alive but dead" - yea that me when my mom asked my report card.

  • Phillip Wombacher
    Phillip Wombacher3 ditë më parë

    lol no we are missing something I truly beleive we havent even begun to scratch the surface of particle physics

  • Victor Gomes
    Victor Gomes3 ditë më parë

    Me after 0:18 secs: “ not my cup of tea”.

  • rdobery
    rdobery3 ditë më parë

    So there really is a world where the drive through didn't screw up the burger....that's hard to imagine.

  • mark huirua
    mark huirua3 ditë më parë

    For all the losers in this world, there is another version of you in another universe who’s rich, healthy and gloriously living with the woman of his dreams. You made it!! Well done!

  • Peripheralzx


    3 ditë më parë

    You are insulting and helping everyone who read and was motivated bythis comment

  • Larry Gill
    Larry Gill3 ditë më parë

    I understood all of this because I watched Maj. Carter explanation in Stargate SG1 😚

  • Captain Chair
    Captain Chair3 ditë më parë

    Quantum Physics; melting Human brains since the 20th century; or does it!

  • sweetnumb
    sweetnumb3 ditë më parë

    "I guess you've never seen an alive and dead cat before." Are you saying I'm too young to have seen Austin Powers?

  • Rich Dad Summit
    Rich Dad Summit3 ditë më parë

    Great explanation of the many worlds interpretation but I still don't understand the evidence of it? Who says the other wave functions exist anywhere else? What evidence do we have of that?

  • john franco
    john franco4 ditë më parë

    Isn't this all just a theory?

  • john franco

    john franco

    3 ditë më parë

    @Ken Jackson that behaviors why aliens won't talk to us

  • Ken Jackson

    Ken Jackson

    3 ditë më parë

    Yes, John. It's an unprovable, unfalsifiable theory that people fallback on to avoid reality.

  • Captain Chair

    Captain Chair

    3 ditë më parë

    All science is a theory. Fact is the status que.

  • kate
    kate4 ditë më parë

    the introooo😭😭

  • RogueJyn
    RogueJyn4 ditë më parë

    Just imagine, there are worlds where the cold war went hot and the earth is a wasteland

  • That one dude •-•
    That one dude •-•4 ditë më parë

    This is basically just a complicated way of saying that if monkey man does not know something, than monkey man cannot accurately predict that something The world doesn’t revolve around monkey man

  • Kai Hyena
    Kai Hyena4 ditë më parë

    Genuine question: If the universe is constantly subdividing, possibly infiinite times per second and energy is conserved, wouldnt the amount of energy each universe "has" approach 0 pretty fast? unless the entire universe had infinite energy to share among infinite worlds.

  • Igor
    Igor4 ditë më parë

    12:20 "it doesn't look that way to us because we only experience our tiny sliver of the multiverse" Not at all superb statement... not a little!! The guy is so auto sufficiently convict of his believes that he AFFIRMS that actually EXISTS a multiverse. HA! First) Please, man. Give a chance to the possibility that you are completely wrong. Second) It is preponderant to deposit all our trust in an exact science like quantum mechanics - even in the exact sciences in general. Third) Have the humanity ever traveled more than a light year? Fourth) Is the mankind even certain about what exists beyond our own galaxy? (HA! No, boy.) I could continue to write about the limits of the actual science. But I just wanted to express my non-conformity with the preponderant, arrogant, imperative and, finally, UNFOUNDED allegations, so said around. P.S.: Big bang was not proved. Cheers.

  • Sunil Behera
    Sunil Behera4 ditë më parë

    In case of schrondizer's cat there are 2 possible case :- alive or dead But take other cases We reach to the outcome by infinite no of ways Say 1+2 =3 , 5-2=3 , etc so on.. So does it mean there are infinite parallel universe ,, solving the above example in different ways ? Another example say we have millions of thought Means every thought of us is been covering up by some of "me" ( in parallel universe) right !!

  • pero stark
    pero stark4 ditë më parë

    if you open a box and there is dead cat becouse of radiation poisoning then you are dead to. Think outside of box

  • Balanced Life
    Balanced Life4 ditë më parë

    What if its biblical. A creator created infinite possibilities for us, the one we chose, becomes the outcome. Too simple?

  • Balanced Life

    Balanced Life

    3 ditë më parë

    @Captain Chair I would think that the creator would not give us the means to verify, or know his existence, by science at least. By faith, perhaps. Either way, what better test for a mouse, than a maze that is interactive, works with your intentions to create new possibilities.

  • Captain Chair

    Captain Chair

    3 ditë më parë

    Then you have another problem; you have to scientifically verify that creator. If there is a god or pantheon of gods, the one thing we know for fact is they really don’t want us to be certain.

  • Chruściel
    Chruściel4 ditë më parë

    Are you in Copenhagen?

  • Tiberiu-Cezar Salavastru
    Tiberiu-Cezar Salavastru4 ditë më parë

    Me at 2 am watching a video I don't understand

  • SubjectDelta9
    SubjectDelta94 ditë më parë

    Brilliant!!! If all the creation is the CREATOR experiencing reality, it is only LOGICAL and NATURAL that the method (also a Creation) would encompass Infinite Probabilities and Possibilities. No waste of Time or Space. Einstein is Right. The Creator is not playing Dice with the Universe, It is Experiencing "ALL THAT IS" SIMULTANEOUSLY.

  • Aldo the Lizard
    Aldo the Lizard4 ditë më parë

    I tossed a coin, the reality just branched, you're welcome

  • Rancid Jax
    Rancid Jax4 ditë më parë

    10:40 rick and morty

  • Wicho ThaGreat
    Wicho ThaGreat4 ditë më parë

    Wait so if someone measures the universe it would all collapse

  • Angel In Training
    Angel In Training4 ditë më parë

    The way me and my sister think about it is that because conditions will sometimes sync up among the other branches, sometimes two 'timelines' will collapse to create the same outcome. This is mimicked in the 'fixed points in time' theory seen in Dr. Who. Sometimes, there may be an outcome that is so probabilistic that it occurs across most, if not all, branches. So if timelines are constantly branching and collapsing, the probability of certain things occurring will increase along the way. Of course, neither of us have a degree in science or math that would support these ideas. It's just something that we hypothesized based on our experiences. Oddly enough, there is anecdotal evidence of people experiencing these timeline/ many world jumps. If you are so compelled, you can search for reddit conversations on the subject. I had an interesting thought while watching this video and wish there was someone smarter than myself who could explore the idea. What if all that dark matter/ dark energy of the universe is actually the mass of all those alternate worlds? There, but not visible to us.

  • Andreas Björkman
    Andreas Björkman4 ditë më parë

    Many worlds theory also leads to a lot of preposterous conclusions, if we follow a specific set of branches we can reach silly outcomes. Imagine, for example, that we follow the branch that happens every time someone flips a coin, and we always take the branch where it resulted in heads. Then we can conclude that there is a universe where flipped coins can only ever land on heads, and has only ever landed on heads. There's also a universe in which the desired outcome of a probabilistic event always happens and science evolved radically differently because the expected result was always the one given.

  • Andreas Björkman

    Andreas Björkman

    2 ditë më parë

    @Peripheralzx and there are countless ones where life failed for one reason or another, or simply never began at all. Your point? I was just illustrating that by the definition of multiverse there's at least one parallel world where probability exists in a degenerate state.

  • Peripheralzx


    3 ditë më parë

    There’s a universe where no one has ever died

  • Uryuom Orken
    Uryuom Orken5 ditë më parë

    Veritasium I'd like to say Ty for making this channel a valuable one, a pathless door to give Thyself knowledge round the planet.

  • Netemp Witemp
    Netemp Witemp5 ditë më parë

    At last it seems science has a proof of Karma

  • Emmanuel Vidaya
    Emmanuel Vidaya5 ditë më parë

    I just want to know how rick do interdimensional travel

  • Winchester Lyon
    Winchester Lyon5 ditë më parë

    Why is it that physic ignores consciousness as a force that affects these experiments? Just accepted that "it's one way if we look and another way if we don't look"? Why is there no curiosity as to what is causing this?

  • Imani
    Imani5 ditë më parë

    I don’t get it 🤔

  • Eternal Paradox
    Eternal Paradox5 ditë më parë

    So... Everything is happening at the same time, we simply limit it by our ability to process it and our collective selves experiencing "reality" are simply the versions that intercept with each other?

  • CommonCentsRob
    CommonCentsRob5 ditë më parë

    Great video but please don't use that lens again. It was almost fisheye and when the professor waved his hands around it was a little nauseating.

  • geoh7777
    geoh77775 ditë më parë

    On the first day in the class "Probability and Stochastic Processes" that I took a long time ago, the professor walked in the door and without saying anything else, said, "Saying "probably" means that you don't know."

Faqja Tjeter